15. The bees are great, and all, but a classic they are not! The 1980 original does a great job of building up the lore around the town of Antonio Bay and the seafaring ghosts that haunt its people. Instead of dying, his. This is an interesting one, since Black Christmas (2006) is one of the worst horror remakes ever made and is an unscary, cringe-worthy and . The 1953 film is actually a remake of the pre-Code film Mystery of the Wax Museum which came out in 1933. RELATED: All 4 Night Of The Living Dead Remakes Ranked Worst to Best. Horror Movie Remakes That Are Better Than The Original. Naomi Watts anchors the film as journalist Rachel Keller, who begins investigating the mysterious death of her teenage niece following a trip to a remote cabin. Thir13en Ghosts (2001) Unless you've been duped by the misleading box cover art that pretends Jack Nicholson is the star of 1960's "Little Shop of Horrors," chances are you don't even realize the musical starring Rick Moranis, Ellen Greene, Vincent Gardenia, Steve Martin, and Levi Stubbs featuring a singing "mean green mother from outer space" is a remake. John Carpenter has one of the most impressive horror filmographies of any director, and while The Fog is not among his most popular, it is not bad by any means. NEXT: 10 Horror Movies That Are Perfect For The Christmas Holidays. The Pang brothers ' 2002 film, The Eye, is a poignant and haunting story about a blind woman who develops the ability to see ghosts after having a corneal transplant. The 2010 Uruguayan filmLa Casa Muda(The Silent House) is quite an achievement, all things considered. When the infected townspeople overwhelm their captors, our presumably immune heroes scramble to evade the growing number of crazies and the remaining soldiers (who've been ordered to execute all civilians). The film boasts a similar premise with an alien invasion happening in a California town unbeknownst to its residents. With the original "It" miniseries, we got a great performance from Tim Curry as Pennywise, but ultimately, a compromised version of the sprawling horror epic that King crafted in 1986. While the first "Inside" was made in searing style, the American remake dilutes the horror of the original, changes the ending, and eliminates the most extreme scenes in a way that saps all the tension. Molly Pennington, Stacker Oct 24, 2022 Oct 24, 2022 . David Cronenberg is responsible for more than his fair share of genre classics including "Scanners" and "Videodrome," but the filmmaker arguably gave us his crowning achievement in 1986 with his remake of "The Fly." Not that the remake is agreat film, by any means, but it's far more effective than the original, which may be the most overrated horror film ever. The stakes feel real for all of the characters, simply because the ghosts look so believably menacing. The third CD, Death Note Original Soundtrack III was released on June 27, 2007. Dracula isn't the suave bloodsucker made famous by Bela Lugosi and Christopher Lee, but a scary and sickly old man who stalks his prey at night, unforgettably played by Klaus Kinski. It tries to add almost everything the original had that made it so effective, but it does so without as much heart or care so it all comes together as something not as successful. This makes the remake feel like an unabashed attempt to improve upon the original, picking and choosing which parts are good and which need to be replaced - but this also seems impossible to achieve in hindsight when remaking a film so important to film history. The Thing's ability to assume the shape of other lifeforms is a major source of tension in Carpenter's film, fueling the distrust and paranoia the crewmembers have for one another and creating a heightened air of suspense for viewers that isn't quite achieved in the original. From ghost stories to a house with a haunted family, there are many movies from the 2000s and 2010s that can be considered awesome remakes. Game Rant's Ultimate Guide To Horror Movies. Similarly, why think of a new story when you can recycle one that worked so well in a previous decade? Or if not completely better holds a close candle to the original. Not so the 2012 remake, which understands its tone all too well. There, she discovers the now-infamous cursed videotape that dooms its watchers to a horrific death within seven days of viewing. Funny, thrilling and heartbreaking, the remake is arguably better than the stellar original. The 2005 remake had the opportunity to fix this one issue of Carpenter's film but didn't take it. Silent House is a heavy-duty upgrade to its ultra-low budget predecessor, not to mention criminally underrated. But the strong performances--most notably a terrifying Garret Dillahunt as the gang leader Krug--and gripping storytelling make it an overall superior movie. The film follows two teenage characters who, after seeing a meteor crash while necking at Lover's Lane, decide to find the object. on June 26, 2019 at 6:48AM PDT. By keeping the book's original idea of a shape-shifting alien that hides unseen amongst its human prey, Carpenter creates a brooding atmosphere of paranoid suspicion that keeps its audience utterly gripped. The original "Willard" starring Bruce Davison is pretty good, but Glover walks the tightrope between terrifying and pathetic in a way that makes the remake ultimately more compelling. It was a clever gimmick, and the only real reason to revisit "13 Ghosts" today, because, as a whole, the film isn't particularly scary, well-acted, or well-crafted. The remake didn't change the plot, but made two radical and inspired choices. Coppola's film breathes life into the text, making many of its most memorable moments into something even more stunning. What is a reboot vs remake? It's an intensely disturbing approachwell-written, expertly shot, and with a ridiculously impressive performance by Wood. The Brian De Palma Scarface is so popular, and so beloved, that I think most people would arguably say that it's better. What makes "House of Wax" such a fantastic remake is that Jaume Collet-Serra leaned into the tropes of the 2000s slasher boom, and wasn't afraid to revel in the ones that would define the era. Both films utilize the human fear and fascination with an unknown "other," but the 1951 adaptation has most of the characters more or less united against the titular Thing, while the presence of the Thing turns the men against each other in the 1982 version. The 1960 film is so ingrained into the filmic social consciousness that such a close recreation doesn't add anything to the experience, and gives more reason to rewatch the original to unpack its layers. Born and raised in Missouri, Hayden moved to the PNW to pursue his graduate education at WSU, where he also worked as an English composition teacher. (Deshawn Thomas). It was well-received, butas noted in some of its reviewssuffered from a tone that some went so far as to call "relentlessly humorless," and fielded a cast that could be less than engaging. Press J to jump to the feed. Because of these shifting fears, horror movie remakes are uniquely positioned to be as or more artistically successful as their inspiratory predecessors. Films such as Halloween, Friday the 13th, and Nightmare on Elm Street are just a few that have received a remake. The film was written by Chad and Carey W. Hayes, the twin brothers who would go on to write "The Conjuring." The cinematic techniques first displayed in this German horror movie classic can be seen in many films throughout the 20th century and up until now. "House of Wax" is a lean, mean, face-ripping machine, and a grotesquely stunning presentation of how digital effects can be used to enhance the terror of practical creations. Everything from the acting, dialogue, set pieces, environments, costumes, and Scottish folk soundtrack come together to continually instill a feeling of dread up until the horrifying, incendiary finale. These movies explore the terrors of technology, cellphones, or the internet, as modern life takes on a hellish shape. It's a fast-moving, enjoyable film that weaves a conspiracy subplot into the gloopy monster action. Shelley White 10/3/2022. He discovers the reincarnation of his lost love in the young Mina Harker (played by Winona Ryder), though her husband Jonathan (played by a slightly miscast Keanu Reeves) will stop at nothing to try and save her from his supernatural clutches. The remake also allows Molly (Rooney Mara) to escape a fully corrupt Stan, whereas the original has her reappear in his life at his lowest point, severely undermining Stan's descent to the most inferior rung on the freak show ladder. Its popularity is extended further by the relative popularity of its two sequels. Ultimately, the changes of the remake seem careless, because they do not acknowledge what worked and didn't work in the original. The result is one of the very best horror remakes, an emotional, tragic, scary, and stomach-churning classic marked by incredible visual effects and a star-making performance from Jeff Goldblum as Seth Brundle, the ambitious scientist whose experiments with teleportation go terribly wrong. It differs from a remake, in that a remake usually takes an older movie and uses a new cast, with modest changes to the story. While this may seem scarier, it loses the heart and innovation of the original for the sake of looking flashier. Thanks to Oz's background working with the Jim Henson Company, he was able to wrangle some of the best puppeteers in the business, and Lyle Conway of "The Muppets Show," "Dark Crystal," and "The Great Muppet Caper" delivered puppet impeccability with Audrey II. The denouement leaves open the potential for a sequel, but sadly, "The Blob" was an unmitigated commercial disaster for Tri-Star. It was the basis for The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror episode Fly Vs. It's a remake of the 1932 film by Howard Hawks. It's marked by standout performances from its young cast and real emotional depth, as well as a creepy atmosphere and some great scares. Released in 2006, the film garnered middling reviews despite being every bit as stylish and effective asHigh Tension(while ratcheting the gore way, way up). If a movie can arrive with a built-in audience via a recognisable brand, then it stands a better chance at the box office than something entirely original. The '70s and '80s were a fantastic time for horror, and the classics of that era all seem to have made their way back to screens in recent years, rebooted for a new generationwith decidedly mixed results. The 2005 remake, receiving a 5.8 on IMDb to the original's score of 8.1, tries to live inside the shadow of the 1920 film to its detriment. While there have been plenty of disappointing remakes in the horror genre in the last few years, there have also been some new takes on classics that have even managed to improve on the. But he wasn'tonly concerned with killer hordes of undead; with 1973'sThe Crazies, he branched out into killer hordes of the living, with a story about inhabitants of a small town going mindlessly homicidal when exposed to an experimental virus. FNF Vs Indie Cross.The adventures in the FNF world have become so bright and engaging that even famous characters from the popular Indie projects decided to visit this universe and have some fun in dynamic rap battles with Boyfriend. This collection of titles is all killer, no filler, but it's also rooted in the individual tastes of the team. This version also functions more effectively as a cautionary tale about greed and deception than the original film, which omits several more controversial plot details from the novel, like the tragically botched abortion that haunts Ezra Grindle (Richard Jenkins), or the fact that Stan's (Bradley Cooper) willingness to forgo all decency and perform "spook shows" against his mentor's warnings leads to the murder-suicide of a grieving couple. Black Christmas (2006) - Claire's Relative. The entirety of The Ring is saturated in dull blue that can become tedious to watch, whileRinguis full of the varied colors that allow for contrast between the mundane and more frightening scenes, and thus increase the tension all the more. The horror genre wouldn't be the same without Sam Raimi's 1981 classicThe Evil Dead. From remakes of Halloween and Friday the 13th to A Nightmare of Elm Street and Child's Play, no horror series is ever truly dead. It is likely because this movie did it so well on just about every level that later remakes, such as 2007's "The Invasion," have had such a hard time finding the same level of success. The 2020 remake ends with revenge, while the original does not contain any sort of meaningful or satisfying catharsis. The gelatinous menace of Irvin Yeaworth's 1958 B-movie favorite is a lot creepier in theory than in execution. With all due respect to Siegel's film, director Philip Kaufman perfected this tale with his 1978 adaptation. In some cases, directors such as John Carpenter and David Cronenberg went back to the 1950s and remade B-movies of the day like The From Another World and The Fly, updating them with their own sensibilities and cutting edge VFX. Watt's performance is also a career-best, portraying a woman balancing motherhood, her job, and her own desires. It could be argued that 2017's It isn't so much a remake as another adaptation of Stephen King's classic 1987 novel. and our While promoting his new film, Amsterdam, Bale took part in a lengthy cover interview for GQ where he opened up about his . If done correctly, as with John Carpenter's "The Thing," they become the stuff of legends; Iconic additions to the horror cannon that will truly stand the test of time. Both films are based on the story "Who Goes There?" They were very, very wrong of course, and it is now rightly considered one of the best horror movies of the decade. The original film is actually from 1951, and was titled The Thing From Another World. The gliding-and-sliding extraterrestrial becomes a tad more concerning as it gets larger via each person it consumes, but it's just too darn slow to throw a scare into the viewer. One was to cast Elijah Wood as Frank. The military attempts to restore order, but they only exacerbate the situation. Chuck Russell and Frank Darabont remedied this and then some with their spiffy 1988 remake. (BJ Colangelo). Finally, the remake is more engaging because the viewers are pulled into a sort of intimacy with the film's heroine as the audience is the only other party privy to Adrien's sadistic games for the majority of the film, allowing them to share in Cecilia's frustration, helplessness, and rage. Cookies help us deliver our Services. RT @CMelodytheFan: Good choices. Additionally, "The Thing" is overall just scarier than its black-and-white ancestor. The original is the classic tale of a scientist who gets more than he bargained for and is driven mad as a result, while the remake is a harrowing psychological thriller featuring a woman's efforts to escape an abusive scumbag. Today's Wordle Answer (412) Warzone Patch Notes Madden 23 Patch Notes Rust Force Wipes Schedule PS Plus August Games . Writers Neal Marshall Stevens and Richard D'Ovidio managed to take the original source material and twist it into one of the most enjoyable rides one can have while watching a horror film. One thing that makes praising Verbinski's accomplishment a little trickier is that the original film is also really, really good. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts Strangely, Tony Gardner's monster is less memorable than its kills. The 2020s & Beyond. It's an excellent and disturbing piece, and many of its fans saw the 2007 remakealso directed by Haneke, a nearly shot-for-shot recreation of the originalas completely unnecessary, if not insulting. This is never more true than in the horror genre. Alfred Hitchcock's prolific direction stood out in many of his works, but it showed inPsycho as one of his best. This is really only half a movie too--the upcoming It: Chapter 2 will complete the story. By using our Services, you agree to our use of cookies. Andr De Toth's original is itself a remake of 1933's "Mystery of the Wax Museum," but a landmark film in horror history as the very first color 3D feature film from a major American studio. This serves to make his version at once unrelentingly engaging, yet difficult to watch. If Ryan Murphy is involved with a horror remake, then you know you're not just going to get a slavish repeat of the past. The film hooks viewers with its all-too-believable opening scene, where the town drunk wanders onto a baseball field with a shotgun, and it gets creepier from there. The film was famous for its marketing campaign of "See Paris Die," a reference to the promised death of a character named Paige Edwards played by Paris Hilton, solidifying itself as one of the strongest time capsule films to capture the decade. The original Maniac is an effectively grimy slice of early '80s grindhouse cinema, with the late Joe Spinell as Frank, a psychotic killer who uses the scalps of his female victims to decorate the mannequins in his apartment. Returning to the same story years later and doing it in much the same way is rarely enough, even if your core audience didn't grow up with that first movie. You may not agree with what made the cut, and you may feel that other titles were short-changed. What they didn't yet know was that it was being helmed by a heretofore unknown major talent, and would turn out to be one of the best horror films of the decade. However, many are not. Answer (1 of 15): When it comes to remakes, it is a mixed bag as to whether the original or the remake is better. Willard is one part Norman Bates and one part the Joker, his fury and mommy issues combined into something that's ultimately deadly. Russell and Darabont work in clever variations on the original's small-town stereotypes, though the casting of A-plus character actors like Jeffrey DeMunn, Candy Clark, Del Close, and Art LaFleur is every bit as integral to nailing the film's cheerfully irreverent spirit. What follows is a gripping, heartbreaking, and disgusting tale of man becoming the beast as Brundle is slowly taken over by the fly's DNA, turning into a gigantic, hideous man-beast. That the Michael Bay-produced 2009 remake outclassed its predecessor in terms of filmmaking craft was hardly surprising. So while Dennis Iliadis's remake isn't perhaps quite as gruelling, it is a far more consistent movie. (Ryan Scott). Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II (MW2) isn't supposed to be a remake of Infinity Ward's 2009 game of the same name. Of course, most horror remakes are not good. It's an eerie gem, less comedic than many of Price's subsequent films, and early proof that sometimes horror remakes get it right. For legal reasons Murnau's movie couldn't be titled Dracula, but the story was otherwise identical to Stoker's novel. (Jeremy Smith). The 2010 Mexican filmSomos Lo Que Hay (We Are What We Are) was a confounding piece of work: a dark, brooding, well-made psychodrama about a family of cannibals, and how they adjust after the family patriarch dies. "House of Wax" 2005, however, is a disgusting feast where the house always wins. UPROXX - Mike Redmond 19h. Director Jim Mickle, whose previous efforts included the underrated vampire flickStake Land, uses the material to raise questions about the dangers of tradition and religion that were completely absent from the original, and he trades that film's endinga fairly standard tangle with police, including the obligatory shootoutfor one of the most bizarre, haunting conclusions of any horror film this decade. A compelling tale of a man obsessed boasting not one but two stellar performances and some impressively disturbing visuals make this version of "The Fly" leaps and bounds better than its predecessor. Nevertheless, the 1990 TV miniseries version of the King novel is an iconic adaptation and there's no doubt that many viewers of the new movie compared it to the earlier version. John Carpenter's "The Thing" is technically a remake of the 1951 sci-fi film "The Thing From Another World," but it has some major narrative differences that place it a step above its predecessor. The Blob (1958): Directed by Irvin Yeaworth, the original is probably best remembered as the first starring role of a 28-year-old Steve McQueen. The remake features big-name. Horror has long thrived on sequels, remakes, and reboots, which can be made cheaply and quickly. However, this movie is held back a bit by pacing issues: the build-up is significantly longer than the pay-off, leaving the film to feel somewhat slow and unbalanced. It is an interesting exercise in exploring what makes a film unique, but it feels more like a replica than a remake; more like a film student exercise than something justifying revision. The extraterrestrials are capable of making exact copies of humans, leading to some people acting strange. There are plenty of gems among the Universal "Dracula" films where he was played by Bela Legosi, and Christopher Lee's Hammer "Dracula" films are also pretty fantastic, but Francis Ford Coppola's adaptation of the material is a masterpiece. (BJ Colangelo). Creepy, mysterious, and timeless, this version of "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" has truly stood the test of time. Both games are developed 13 years apart. It differs from a remake, in that a remake usually takes an older movie and uses a new cast, with modest changes to the story. Ironically, the 2013 remake loses the charm of the original by gaining a bigger budget. For more information, please see our Horror Throughout The Years. It's an excellent and disturbing piece, and many of its fans saw the 2007 remakealso directed by Haneke, a nearly shot-for-shot recreation of the originalas completely unnecessary, if not. No less an authority than the great Roger Ebert wondered why Goldblum didn't receive an Oscar nomination; in a retrospective on the film, Ebert said, "The Exorcist aside, I can't think of another horror film as intense asThe Fly.". The 1980 original does a great job of building up the lore around the town of Antonio Bay and the seafaring ghosts that haunt its people. William Castle would be proud. Russell's direction is unfussy and efficient; he zips through the pseudo-scientific exposition and keeps the viewer on their toes by killing off some of the film's most likable characters early on. The original Psycho has many different sequels and iterations, including the somewhat recent television series Bates Motel. Howard Hawks' 1932 Scarface has a story that should be familiar to fans of Brian De Palma's 1983 remake: A low-ranking homicidal hood works his way up the gangster corporate ladder, sadistically. It features the new opening and closing themes by Maximum the Hormone in the TV size format. The film features a visual flair that's hard to top, with some truly inventive ways of stretching the budget to make everything feel even more grandiose and extravagant. Verbinski's remake is a finely tuned machine with slowly building tensionin the form of a seven-day countdown to death for whomever watches the tapebaked right in. Even though the viewer may be able to guess the ending of this mystery about a missing girl in a pagan colony, the original cult horror movie,TheWicker Man is still a masterclass in building atmosphere. Director Glen Morgan's 2003 remake of "Willard" went all the way back to the source material, Stephen Gilbert's 1968 short novel "Ratman's Notebooks," and he cast the coolest creepy character actor, Crispin Glover, in the title role. 20 remakes that are way better than the original. They toy with the iconography in surprisingly cheeky ways while turning Jason Voorhees into a more hulking, brute-force predator than he was in the previous movies. It's hard to beat a cast quite . 30. Actually Good Movies Where the Monster is Fake Underrated Movies About Bugs Great Villains Stuck In Underwhelming Movies Original Vampire . Dan Auty William Malone's remake, which stars Geoffrey Rush as the millionaire (doing a Vincent Price impression no less) is a wild thrill ride of a horror movie. But we all seem to forget that remakes and reboots have been around for as long as Hollywood, and sometimes, a good yarn needs more than one attempt to get it just right. That's not the case for the title character in both film adaptations of "Willard," about a lonely and brow-beaten man who finds himself with the ability to command the critters to do his bidding after befriending two rats that he names Socrates and Ben. The original Hong Kong horror 'The Eye' and the 2008 American remake starring Jessica Alba. Its grimy, low-budget aesthetic and the wild-eyed, none-too-subtle lead performance of co-screenwriter Joe Spinnell only add to its disturbing charms, and some of the practical gore effectslike the infamous shotgun-through-the-windshield scene, filmed on a New York City street with no permitare jaw-dropping even today. In it, a scientist experimenting with teleportation gets his atoms mixed up with those of a common housefly; as a result, he's stuck with a giant fly head while pursuing the fly, which has his tiny human head, in an attempt to fix the mistake. While sometimes a horror remake surprises fans, most are pretty low-quality, and these are the worst ones. Made on a shoestring budget with no-name actors, the film used guerrilla special effects and first-time director Raimi's wildly inventive camera work to sell its story of a stay at an old cabin in the woods that goes horrifyingly wrong for a group of young people when an ancient, evil force is accidentally summoned.

Economic Impact Of Long Covid, Can You Keep Cooked Lobster In The Shell, Applying For State Assistance, Napier Airport Runway Length, Bathroom Drawer Organization Hacks, Keller Williams International Phone Number, Adp Workforce Manager, New Jersey Warn Act Severance, Essential Grammar In Use Supplementary Exercises 4th Edition Pdf, Warsaw Modlin Airport To City Center, Best Fellowships For Writers,